How do contraception preferences change over time? Eight years of experience in a tertiary hospital.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the contraceptive preferences of women based on their age and to track changes in these preferences over time. METHODS: This was an observational, retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from 2742 patients were evaluated for this study. The patient group of the first 4 years was classified as Group I (n=1371) and the last 4 years was classified as Group II (n=1371). The preferred contraception methods between the groups and their changes across the years were examined. RESULTS: Coitus interruptus was found to be the prevailing contraceptive method across all age groups, with 304 (70.9%) in 18-24 age group; 1314 (65.4%) in 25-40 age group; and 148 (48.8%) in 41-53 age group using this method. Breastfeeding rates were also analyzed across age groups, revealing that 11% of patients aged 18-24 years, 5% of patients aged 25-40 years, and 1.7% of patients aged 41-53 years were breastfeeding. Among these patients, 114 (74.5%) were not using any contraception method, while coitus interruptus remained the most popular choice. CONCLUSION: It was determined that there are many couples who do not have sufficient knowledge regarding family planning and birth control in our country. At the same time, the use of birth control methods has increased due to the increase in the education level of women and easier access to sexual health services.

Can the Combination of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predict the Mass Origin in Ovarian Masses?

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), blood parameters, and tumor markers to determine the role of objective criteria in distinguishing malignant, borderline, and benign masses and to minimize unnecessary surgical interventions by reducing interpretation differences. Methods: The histopathological and clinical-laboratory results of the patients who underwent surgery for the initial diagnosis and whose ovarian masses were confirmed were retrospectively reviewed. Between groups, age, cancer antigen 125, mean platelet volume (MPV), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the presence of ascites, the ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system MRI scores, mass characteristics, and lymphocyte count were compared. Results: The study comprised a total of 191 patients. These patients were categorized into three groups: Benign (n=113), borderline (n=26), and malignant (n=52). No noteworthy correlation was detected between the unilocular or multilocular nature of solid, cystic, or mixed masses and the rates of NLR, PLR, or MPV. However, a notable correlation was identified between NLR and the presence of acidity (p=0.003). In ovarian cancer patients, there was no significant difference in NLR and MPV between malignant epithelial and malignant sex cord-stromal types (p>0.05), whereas a significant difference emerged in the PLR ratio (p=0.013). Conclusion: In ovarian masses with malignant potential, laboratory parameters such as NLR and PLR can guide the diagnosis process. In the future, various studies such as the development of different tests, markers, and imaging methods, the use of blood tests such as NLR, PLR, and MPV in cancer diagnosis will be possible. The results of these studies may contribute to the development of new methods for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer and the improvement of treatment protocols.

Teres lift-up technique: a retrospective comparative study for an alternative route for laparoscopic entry in gynecologic and oncologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic surgery is the favored method for the surgical treatment of gynecologic diseases and malignancies. We have defined an anatomic landmark-based, easy-to-perform, and an alternative way of open laparoscopic entry technique named the ligamentum teres lift-up technique (TLU) that can be used in obese or normal-weight women to tackle the risks of the closed laparoscopic entry technique, namely, Veress needle entry (VNE). STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective comparative study, the participants were equally distributed to either the TLU group (n = 36) or the VNE group (n = 36) in a 1:1 ratio. The participants were stratified according to their BMI as follows: BMI between 20-25 kg/m2 (average weight), 25-30 kg/m2 (overweight), 30-35 kg/m2 (class I obesity), and 35-40 kg/m2 (class II obesity). Both laparoscopic access techniques were compared according to the entry time, vascular or visceral injuries, insufflation failures, trocar-related complications, and omental damage. RESULTS: The TLU group had a considerably shorter entry time than the VNE group (74.43 ± 21.45 s versus 192.73 ± 37.93 s; p < 0.001). Only one failed insufflation occurred in the VNE group (p = 0.32); however, that case was successfully insufflated with the TLU technique. Only one intestinal injury was seen in the VNE group, encountered during trocar site closure (p = 0.32). The subgroup analyses of the TLU and VNE groups based on BMI strata revealed a continuation of the statistical significance of entry time between BMI-matched groups. CONCLUSION: The current study reveals that the new alternative TLU technique supplies an alternative, validated, and rapid access to the abdominal cavity in normal-weight and obese women. This new approach offers an easy-to-teach and easy-to-perform technique for surgical mentors and residents in gynecologic and oncologic surgeries.